"War of the Worlds" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Main] >> General Chat



Message


Tudor Rose -> "War of the Worlds" (9 Jan. 2005 8:56:52 )

I know...at first glance you're probably wondering what this has to do AboutBritain but...H.G. Wells set his book in London while the movie was moved to California. A small preview is now out about the redoing of that original classic by Steven Spielberg. Unfortunately for me, Tom Cruise is the star [:'(] but I guess I can override that fact and see the fil-lum anyway. I'd love to know how faithful Spielberg is to the novel. The novel had The Martians grabbing people, throwing them into baskets for the stew pot. It would also be great to have the story back in London...but then I'm prejudiced in that direction [p]




AngloSaxon -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (9 Jan. 2005 9:28:55 )

No I prefer to see California blitzed by Flying Saucers not London. We have had our share of being blitzed thank you without the martians doing it as well.

I quite like the idea of chucking Californians into a stewpot along with the spuds and the carrots. Shannon and the Prof would cook up a treat methinks...[;)]




Tudor Rose -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (9 Jan. 2005 10:05:52 )

My sympathy goes to Tokyo...that Godzilla, such a character [sm=rotfl.gif]




Lisa -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (9 Jan. 2005 13:49:57 )

Are you kidding, Tudor? Steven Spielberg is doing a re-make? I am not a fan of
re-making many of the old fil-lums...they rarely are as good as the originals. I LOVED that movie...scared the hell out of me as a kid and it remains one of my favorite sci-fi
flicks. I agree with Tom Cruise being cast as the lead [:'(]...not a fan of his either.
They could at least get a hunky British actor to play the lead instead of the guy they put in every film today who I'm very sick of! [:D] Plus they'll probably over-do the special effects when the very low tech first version was a fine example of creepy[sm=shocked.gif]




saki -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (9 Jan. 2005 14:54:59 )

Nah the scariest 50's horror film was the original The Thing,made my dad who was about 25 then look over his shoulder at work for a week.I love the old 50's horror flix especially the monster ones.Rodan to cool[8D]




Tudor Rose -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (9 Jan. 2005 16:01:50 )

Yep...The Martians are comin' to town once again [:D] I think the scariest part of that entire movie were the sound effects. The do-do-do-do of the death ray just scared the livin' daylights out of me. Do you know how they made the sound? By plucking the guide wires on tall towers and recording the sound the vibration made. Hopefully, the special effects won't be WAY overdone and I do TRULY hope they stay with the book. Sorry London...but I hope you get clobbered by large green men from outer space [6]

Rodan! Mothra! Godzilla! [p] My kind of guys! Don't you just love the little girls who ride on Mothra's back? Didn't quite care for the lobster-monster, though. I kept wanting him to fall into a boiling pot of water so that everybody could have a feast [sm=bouncy.gif]




IanHarryWebb -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (9 Jan. 2005 18:27:58 )

THE ALBUM is cool also.
My Dad loved it.
Its on CD now.




Tudor Rose -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (9 Jan. 2005 18:34:00 )

What album, Ian? Are you talking about the radio show that Orson Welles put on that Halloween night? I know it can be purchased.




Ron Hann -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (11 Jan. 2005 8:31:58 )

I vote for Anglo to Star in the film!!!!!

Who is this joker Tom Cruse, anyway????

I think that one of the scariest flicks I ever watched (through gaps between my fingers) was "The Creature From The Black Lagoon". We used to live in a semi-rural area and had to walk about a mile from the tram terminus, up an unlit rural road alongside a creek. And of course, it was a dark night, and all.[6][6]




Papaumau -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (11 Jan. 2005 13:30:52 )

The original ORIGINAL.....I don't know who it was that did it but the Martian machines were three-legged walkers that just stepped over houses excetera. That other "original" one was about Martian machines that FLEW and had a curvy shape with green lights on the wingtips that sent out a "death ray". While I enjoyed that version I must admit that I preferred the idea that the Martian machines walked instead of flew.

What about you ?




Tudor Rose -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (11 Jan. 2005 14:13:13 )

The book is where the Martian machines were three-legged walkers. Each carried a basket on it's back for putting in their main meal of the day [:'(] The original movie (not to be confused with the remake which Spielberg is in process of doing) is where the Martians were in flying machines and had those horrible heat rays...do-do-do-do [X(]

I am truly hoping that the remake of this classic more follows the book than the first movie. The book was SO good...so scary...that it really didn't need to be 'Hollywooded' up.

And I am also truly REALLY hoping that Tom Cruise is a breakfast snack at the beginning of the fil-lum [sm=propeller.gif]




IanHarryWebb -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (11 Jan. 2005 14:30:28 )

"THE WAR OF THE WORLDS" CD music.
Richard Burton narrator.
Julie Covington [is now a Nun I belive]
David Essex
Justin Hayward
Phil Lynott in
JEFF WAYNE'S
WAR OF THE WORLDS
Musical version.




Papaumau -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (11 Jan. 2005 14:41:58 )

Some links to the stories:

This one gives access to the flying Martian machines....

http://www.war-of-the-worlds.org/

This is text story for anyone who has not read the original....

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/www/warworlds/warw.html

THIS is what the original Martian machines were illustrated as in my favourite comic of the day.....

[img]http://drzeus.best.vwh.net/wotw/wotw1955.1.jpg[/img]




CalProf -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (11 Jan. 2005 16:38:15 )

H.G. Wells was prophetic in forseeing aerial warfare, nuclear weapons, mechanized tanks, and other instruments of modern warfare. In War of the Worlds, he also imagined flying craft and robots, although that word wasn't invented for another 20 years. When he wrote war of the Worlds in 1901, he was influenced by the vast explosion at Krakatoa volcano in the Pacific, which killed hundreds of thousands of people and dimmed the world's sunlight for years with atmospheric ash clouds. He also was affected by the unification and militarization of Germany at the time, which was producing a new arms race, which he believed would lead to a great war.

Why did he write about killer Martians, not killer nations? He wanted to capture the public imagination through fantasy. A few years before he wrote, astronomers believed they had observed water channels or canals on Mars, and one claimed he saw a strange light on the planet's surface. Perhaps Wells felt he would reach a much larger audience by having the Earth's people unite against the foreign invader, much as we saw in the 1950s sci-fi films where the world's nations unite to fight UFO invaders and then decide to impose world peace (e.g. Earth versus the Flying Saucers, and The Day the Earth Stood Still).

It's also been suggested that Wells was trying to remind people that how the Martians treated earthlings was not that different from the conquest and genocide occurring under colonial rule. Wells was an interesting character; his father was a professional crick player. Much of Wells' "History of the World" was plagiarized from a woman who had sent the text to a publisher for review, who then asked Wells to assess it. (He liked it so much that he used it!)

I'd forgotten that in the book, the Martians feast upon people. Actually they drain people's blood as a life fluid for the Martians, who are nothing more than giant brains.

The 1950s film omitted the dining on humans, and added a cute woman in place of the original protagonist's male companion. Our local Cal Tech Institute was featured in the film, set in California, which shows the Hollywood sign and Los Angeles City Hall being destroyed.




Lisa -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (11 Jan. 2005 17:37:34 )

I was thinking the same thing Ron...."Creature from the Black Lagoon" was another excellent sci fi flick, or fil-lum as they say in Scotland! The original version of "The Thing" was another great one but I didn't like the re-make. Except for the scene where the guys head came off, sprouted spider legs and shimmied off into a corner![:'(]

Tudor....I agree about Cruise becoming an alien snack but I doubt it. They never kill off the lead but it would be fun to see! [6]




merry traveler -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (11 Jan. 2005 18:49:20 )

Yeah, I was kind of hoping that the Samurai's sword in "The Last Samurai", wouldn't stop short of its target, i.e. Tom's neck.




Tudor Rose -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (11 Jan. 2005 20:22:36 )

Oh dear...the setting for the movie is the U.S. Not Victorian England which was the setting for the book. Oh, well...I can still hope that Tom gets lazared early in the fil-lum [sm=bouncy.gif]

Go, Martians [p][p]




Quenton -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (11 Jan. 2005 21:27:33 )

War of the Worlds CD here:

Amazon.com

Scroll down, it's got samples you can listen to! Fantastic album!




saki -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (11 Jan. 2005 21:43:11 )

Shame on u guys for saying u want poor little Tom lazed and eaten early,even if i would have to pick him up to say hello,poor LITTLE guy.Now who should have the part ???




Tudor Rose -> RE: "War of the Worlds" (11 Jan. 2005 22:28:17 )

I haven't a clue what sort of character Tom is playing...is he a scientist? A journalist? All I know is that ANYBODY would be better than Cruise. For eye-appeal...how 'bout Johnny Depp?? [:$]




Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.1
0.15625